tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-548248685729133691.post7116371481454105238..comments2024-01-17T13:16:10.378-08:00Comments on Joseph4GI: CIRCUMCISION DEATH: Yes, Another One - This Time in IsraelJosephhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14190648498809795551noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-548248685729133691.post-51233294733161667162013-06-07T08:29:49.426-07:002013-06-07T08:29:49.426-07:00And if it was a preexisting medical condition, the...And if it was a preexisting medical condition, then what had the mother feeding the baby had to do with it? And if it was because he choked, what had the preexisting condition had to do? And what was the preexisting medical condition anyway?<br /><br />The lack of integrity in this reporting reminds me of the first American babies who died from circumcision:<br /><br />"The first known reported circumcision-related deaths (in the United States) were in New York City, where circumcision was introduced. The first was Julius Katzenstein in 1856 and the second was one-week-old Myer Jacob Levy in 1858. Both boys were circumcised by a Dr. Abrahams, and the same coroner reviewed both deaths. The coroner found that Abrahams had performed the surgeries properly, and that the boys died from blood loss as a result of parental neglect. Neither boy had received a follow-up examination."<br /><br />http://www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html<br /><br />Nevermind where the blood was coming from.<br /><br />Yes, it's never the unneeded medical procedure.dreamerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14708824168962037873noreply@blogger.com